Time to ditch NATO? 2… RT 7-8-16… “Poor little NATO vs big bad Russia: a disinformation primer”

rt_cube_logo_150_24Found this link at Futurist Trendcast. It is clear the cabal is resorting to as much “smoke and mirrors” as it can. Guaranteed, awake people aren’t buying it.

This Bloomberg graphic… purports to show that Russia is being “aggressive” by proposing new battalion numbers along its western borders… This graph is being used as a propaganda tool to make it appear that 4,000 ‘defensive’ NATO personnel are facing off against 30,000 “aggressive” Russians.

“The truth is completely different… the Russian units will be stationed exclusively in Russian sovereign territory. The concept of a country keeping armed forces on its own soil is hardly revolutionary… As the image… shows, it is Russia which is outnumbered. And vastly so.

“It seems NATO’s fans in western media are “weaponizing information” to deliver misleading messaging in their “hybrid war” against Russia. “The menace of unreality” indeed.”

—————————————————

Poor little NATO vs big bad Russia: a disinformation primer

What the troop balance on Russia’s northwest border will REALLY look like.

This Bloomberg graphic is being extensively shared on social media by NATO-supporting journalists and writers working for American state media.

It purports to show that Russia is being “aggressive” by proposing new battalion numbers along its western borders. If the information is accurate, it will mean a total of around 30,000 troops split into three divisions.

At the same time, NATO wants to send 4,000 soldiers, mostly American and British, to the Baltic States and Poland. This graph is being used as a propaganda tool to make it appear that 4,000 ‘defensive’ NATO personnel are facing off against 30,000 “aggressive” Russians.

The truth is completely different. [click for the Bloomberg posted image.]

Click to enlarge



[Kp note: I added this one from the Twitter feed above (not in the RT article).] Click to enlarge

For starters, the Russian units will be stationed exclusively in Russian sovereign territory. The concept of a country keeping armed forces on its own soil is hardly revolutionary. By contrast, these American and British servicemen and women will be very far away from home.

Also, the figures are completely misrepresented. As the image below [actually it’s “above”] shows, it is Russia which is outnumbered. And vastly so.

It seems NATO’s fans in western media are “weaponizing information” to deliver misleading messaging in their “hybrid war” against Russia. “The menace of unreality” indeed.

About kauilapele

I am a Spirit of Light working with energies on this planet, previously in Hawai'i (for 15 years), just returned (12-13-13) from Turtle Island (North America), on a mission to assist in humanity's ascension process and help bring about the New Earth. My spiritual missions have taken me from the Big Island of Hawai'i to neighbor islands (Oahu, Kauai), as well as to the mainland US, Peru (Cusco), Bolivia (Lake Titicaca), and Egypt (Gizeh, Saqqara, the Pyramids) (see my YouTube page). As of 12-13-13, I am back on the Big Island.
This entry was posted in apocalypse, cabal, energies, new energies, partners in contrast and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Time to ditch NATO? 2… RT 7-8-16… “Poor little NATO vs big bad Russia: a disinformation primer”

  1. Pingback: Time to ditch NATO? 2… RT 7-8-16… “Poor little NATO vs big bad Russia: a disinformation primer” – ronaldwederfoort

Comments are closed.