[Kp update and correction: Q does mention a ref. to “Corsi, et al.”, in post 1438, where an anon says, “air force one pics from same set as Nov 2017 Q tripcode = Proof that Q = Same Q as always. Direct sot @ corsi et al.“; and in 1341, where an anon wrote, “We’ve all been blinded for too long. Alex Jones is NOT alt media, he is a traitor. He makes us all look crazy.“; although it was not Q itself that stated that. Bottom line, from what I have seen, Q itself did NOT bring up ANY names. Oh well, I’m not going to get that picky about it.]
As a preface to this, please recall that several “big names” started falling away from the Q posts at one point earlier this month. As I recall, both Alex Jones and Jerome Corsi began to report that #Q had “changed tone” or was “compromised”, or something like that (the only Kp blog post I could find about this was this one).
Anyway, “they” appeared to include Alex Jones, Jerome Corsi, David Seaman, and quite a few others, I’m sure. I was not swayed away from the #Q #QAnon, clearly, as Q has continually re-validated itself in recent posts (see these Kp blog posts: post 1, post 2, post 3). And besides, I’m finding it more fun to play the “Q is real info” game, than the other one!
So, I just saw this recently produced video (from Divine Truth, thank you!), which is a selection of snippets from David Wilcock’s interview with Jimmy Church (related Kp blog post). In it he discusses #QAnon, and at 6:22, David states that #QAnon had called out Alex Jones by name:
“…QAnon came out and said that Alex Jones is talking to people who are purporting to be insiders but that they’re really not. And so they attacked him very frontally. They named him.”
Sorry David, this appears to be, “incorrect-a-mundo”. I did a search of the #QAnon collection boards, https://qanon.pub. There’s a little search box in the upper left corner of the page, and here is what I searched for: Alex, Jones, AJ, Jerome, Corsi, JC
I found NO occurrences of any of them (except for 7 occurrences of “JC”, which, in those Q posts, appear to refer to James Comey (see Q posts 436, 551, 559, 645, 675)). My conclusion: There are no Q posts which refer to Alex Jones (and/or Jerome Corsi), by name.
Now, the rest of what David spoke about, Q and the AJ relationship and possible AJ motives for “getting upset”, were right on. It’s only the point about “Q mentioned AJ by name” that I did not find.
So I searched for the word, “profit“. Here is what Q did say in posts containing that word (I’m highlighting portions I felt were relevant, and place the full posts below that) (note: all boldings are mine):
 “Be careful who you are following. Some are profiting off this movement. Some are building a big following off this movement only then to retreat and go mainstream… Patriots are SELFLESS… To some, it’s only about the money. Those who would seek personal gain at the expense of others in this movement has an agenda.
 “They want you DIVIDED. DIVIDED you are WEAK. TOGETHER you are STRONG. There was no attempt to DIVIDE. There was however a strategic move to REVEAL… No names mentioned. They revealed themselves.
 “Why are we being attacked? Why are we being attacked by people who claim to be PRO-POTUS? Do we have a face? Do we have a name? Do we use platforms whereby we collect followers? Selfless. Zero vanity… They all claim to be insiders. They all claim to have insider contacts. They do not… We are a threat to profiteering. Information should flow freely w/o costs…
Control the information (THEY). Harness followers / profiteering (THEY).
 “They attempted to infiltrate, repackage & rebrand as their own. Profit-vehicle. Destroy through [misinformation]. Absorb the ‘confused’. Re-route traffic to other platforms…
Message sent. Message received. Those guilty immediately reacted (predictably)… Exposed. Attempts to divide. We responded. House cleaning.”
I believe that this was an attempt, by the #Q #QAnon team, to allow the “guilty ones” to call themselves out… which they did. By “ranting and raving” (each in their own way) about how they are not guilty of “profiting off the #Q movement”, and then subsequently denigrating and/or “body slamming” anything to do with Q (each in their own way, of course).
That’s my analysis, and my conclusion (now, let’s go to the beach!!).
FULL Q POSTS (that contain the search query, “profit”)